Future Super measures environmental impact of portfolioBY RACHEL ALEMBAKIS | FRIDAY, 26 JUN 2020 10:10AMFuture Super has released its second impact report, measuring the fund's environmental impact both in terms of fossil fuel investments avoided and renewable energy that investments have generated. |
Editor's Choice
Budget 2024: A win for clean energy, not environment
The Federal Budget is an "excellent down-payment" on clean energy - but fails on nature and biodiversity, gas, electrification, and ACCUs.
Stewardship resources should double
Stewardship is under-resourced as investors grapple with assessing how organisations align with the ambitions of clients and beneficiaries.
ESG jobs in 2024: Salaries, career tips and more
In this episode of The Greener Way, we hear from Simon Gvalda, manager of the ESG and Responsible Investment Recruitment team at Kaizen Recruitment, who recently released their much-awaited salary guide for ESG roles in 2024.
Fund selection risk a material issue
Investors face fund selection risk and a substantial disparity in performance when choosing sustainable investment strategies, especially when it comes to ESG exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
"According to recent research from Rainmaker Information ... if a superannuation fund member invested in general balanced or growth super fund options they would have been 1.5% better off over the 12-months to end March if they chose ESG balanced or growth options."
Is there a link to the research? Does this apply to Future Super's options or to some general ESG classification of investment components and therefore also to other super funds that offer ethical and sustainable social impact investment?
Hi Professor Davos,
The research is derived from Rainmaker Information, the parent company to this publication. It refers to a general balanced or growth super fund option compared to a general ESG balanced or growth option (not just Future Super).